Best Greenhouse Alternatives in 2026
Eight applicant tracking systems compared on list prices checked on 10 October 2026, with yearly costs for a 50-employee company where a vendor publishes a price, and the catch in every plan.
For a three-person team hiring for more than one role at a time, Manatal is the cheapest published option at $540 a year. Its price is $15 per user a month, billed annually, checked on Manatal's own pricing page on 10 October 2026. Breezy HR costs nothing while you have one open role, and its Startup plan is $157 a month billed annually once you need a second. Greenhouse publishes no price, so it appears in the table as a labeled estimate: Vendr's marketplace median of $26,570 a year. Lever publishes no price and Recruitee shows no US dollar figure, so both sit at the bottom.
Key facts8 tools compared: Breezy HR, Manatal, JazzHR, Workable, Ashby, SmartRecruiters, Recruitee…
- 8 tools compared: Breezy HR, Manatal, JazzHR, Workable, Ashby, SmartRecruiters, Recruitee, Lever
- Manatal (best for: Small in-house teams of two to five users with up to 15 jobs on the account): $15 per user a month billed annually on Professional; 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates per account
- JazzHR (best for: Small businesses posting a few roles a month that want a flat annual bill): Hero $1,000 a year billed annually (3 job postings a month); Plus $3,480 a year
- Workable (best for: Growing teams that want unlimited active jobs and a price they can read before a demo): Standard $299 a month, or $3,588 a year billed annually; 15-day trial with no card
Greenhouse is the structured-hiring applicant tracking system many talent teams shortlist first, and it is also the one whose price you only learn after a sales demo. That gap is why people search for Greenhouse alternatives. The question is less which ATS has the features and more which one you can price before you book a call. This guide compares eight tools on the dollar figures each vendor prints today, the plan limits behind those figures, and the catch in each plan.
Toolradar data: Toolradar lists 11 direct alternatives to Greenhouse on its own comparison page (toolradar.com/alternatives/greenhouse). Only 2 of the 10 top-ranked tools in its 31-tool applicant tracking ranking (toolradar.com/best/ats, October 2026) publish a free plan.
Costs are worked out for one scenario wherever a vendor's page allows it, so those rows compare fairly. The scenario is a company of 50 employees, three users in the ATS, billed yearly, with one to three open roles at a time. Where a vendor shows no dollar price or prices by band, the card says so rather than guessing.
Top Picks
Based on features, real-world fit, and value for money.
A free applicant tracking plan with unlimited users, capped to one active position, with a flat paid tier once you need a second opening.
Free forever with one active position; Startup $157 a month billed annually for unlimited positions
Teams that hire for one role at a time, or need unlimited users on a free plan
A per-user applicant tracking plan for small teams, with a 14-day trial and no card needed to start.
$15 per user a month billed annually on Professional; 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates per account
Small in-house teams of two to five users with up to 15 jobs on the account
A flat annual applicant tracking plan, the lowest flat price on this list, with a job-posting limit that decides which tier you need.
Hero $1,000 a year billed annually (3 job postings a month); Plus $3,480 a year
Small businesses posting a few roles a month that want a flat annual bill
| Tool | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Breezy HR | Free forever with one active position; Startup $157 a month billed annually for unlimited positions | Teams that hire for one role at a time, or need unlimited users on a free plan |
| Manatal | $15 per user a month billed annually on Professional; 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates per account | Small in-house teams of two to five users with up to 15 jobs on the account |
| JazzHR | Hero $1,000 a year billed annually (3 job postings a month); Plus $3,480 a year | Small businesses posting a few roles a month that want a flat annual bill |
| Workable | Standard $299 a month, or $3,588 a year billed annually; 15-day trial with no card | Growing teams that want unlimited active jobs and a price they can read before a demo |
| Ashby | Foundations $400 a month on the default band (up to 100 employees), 10% off annual | Companies up to 100 employees that want the hiring stack under one subscription |
| SmartRecruiters | Essential starts at $14,995 with no billing term shown; higher plans on request | Enterprise and high-volume hiring teams that expect a sales-led contract |
| Recruitee | No US dollar price shown; Start caps active jobs at 5, Advance has unlimited jobs | Teams that want a no-card free trial and can work within the plan job caps |
| Lever | Quote only: the core platform and add-ons are priced after a quote request | Teams that accept a quote-led purchase and want optional add-ons scoped first |
Pricing read from each vendor's own pricing page, checked Oct 2026. 1 of 8 sells by quote only and publishes no price; that entry says so rather than estimating. 1 of 8 has no standalone price (bundled, usage-based or free to self-host) and is described as charged, not guessed. 1 of 8 publishes prices for some plans and quotes the rest.
Breezy HR
A free applicant tracking plan with unlimited users, capped to one active position, with a flat paid tier once you need a second opening.
- Pricing
- Free forever with one active position; Startup $157 a month billed annually for unlimited positions
Best for: Teams that hire for one role at a time, or need unlimited users on a free plan
Pros
- Bootstrap is free forever with unlimited users, and it is the only free plan among the eight tools in this guide.
- Candidates added in the last 30 days stay searchable on the free plan, so a short pipeline does not lock out recent applicants.
- Startup is a flat monthly price with unlimited positions, so a busy quarter does not change the bill.
Cons
- The free plan holds one active position or candidate pool at a time, so a second open role forces a paid upgrade.
- The first paid step is large: moving from free to Startup on annual billing adds $1,884 a year to the bill.
Manatal
A per-user applicant tracking plan for small teams, with a 14-day trial and no card needed to start.
- Pricing
- $15 per user a month billed annually on Professional; 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates per account
Best for: Small in-house teams of two to five users with up to 15 jobs on the account
Pros
- The lowest published paid price for three users on this list: $540 a year on Professional, billed annually.
- A 14-day trial with no card lets you test the pipeline before you commit to a yearly bill.
- The Enterprise plan at $35 per user a month billed annually lifts the 15-job cap, with unlimited jobs and candidates.
Cons
- The bill grows with every seat: ten users on Professional cost $1,800 a year.
- The 15-job cap on Professional fills quickly for a team with several open roles at once.
JazzHR
A flat annual applicant tracking plan, the lowest flat price on this list, with a job-posting limit that decides which tier you need.
- Pricing
- Hero $1,000 a year billed annually (3 job postings a month); Plus $3,480 a year
Best for: Small businesses posting a few roles a month that want a flat annual bill
Pros
- Three flat annual prices, each billed annually, from Hero through Plus to Pro.
- Plus covers up to 200 active jobs, a large allowance for a team that runs several searches at once.
- The yearly commitment is the only figure you need to budget from, with no per-seat arithmetic.
Cons
- Hero starts at 3 job postings a month, and the page says posting availability depends on eligibility and job boards.
- The page says standard pricing does not apply to staffing or recruiting agencies, so an agency should ask for its own quote.
Workable
A published-price applicant tracking system with unlimited active jobs, priced by employee band, starting at $3,588 a year on Standard.
- Pricing
- Standard $299 a month, or $3,588 a year billed annually; 15-day trial with no card
Best for: Growing teams that want unlimited active jobs and a price they can read before a demo
Pros
- Unlimited active jobs on every plan, so the number of openings never drives the bill.
- The 15-day trial has no card and includes the full Standard feature set, the clearest test among the paid tools on this list.
- Premier at $7,188 a year and Enterprise at $8,628 a year are published, so the step-ups can be budgeted in advance.
Cons
- The price moves with employee count, and the page does not show the band price for a 50-person company.
- AI credit packages above 50,000 credits are quote-only, so heavy AI use needs a sales conversation.
Ashby
An all-in-one hiring platform with a monthly or yearly selector, a 10% annual discount, and quote-only plans above 100 employees.
- Pricing
- Foundations $400 a month on the default band (up to 100 employees), 10% off annual
Best for: Companies up to 100 employees that want the hiring stack under one subscription
Pros
- The Foundations plan has a visible monthly price with a size selector, so the cost is clear before a sales call.
- An annual commitment takes 10% off, which brings the default-band price to $4,320 a year instead of $4,800.
- The all-in-one plan bundles the ATS with the rest of the hiring stack on one bill.
Cons
- Plus, for 101 to 1,000 employees, and Enterprise, for 1,000 and more, both require a quote.
- The page shows only the default band's price and does not break out the 26 to 50 employee band, so a 50-person company should confirm its figure before budgeting.
SmartRecruiters
An enterprise hiring suite whose entry plan starts at $14,995, with the higher tiers and add-ons priced on request.
- Pricing
- Essential starts at $14,995 with no billing term shown; higher plans on request
Best for: Enterprise and high-volume hiring teams that expect a sales-led contract
Pros
- The entry price is published, which Greenhouse and Lever do not do on their pricing pages.
- Four plans and three named add-ons (Advanced Analytics, Custom in-app guidance and Advanced Sandbox) show what the enterprise tier is built to add.
- Its scale fits multi-team hiring, the case where a quote-led contract makes most sense.
Cons
- The $14,995 figure has no billing term or currency code beside it, so treat it as a starting point rather than a quote.
- No free plan or trial is shown on the page.
Recruitee
A recruiting platform with a no-card free trial and plan caps on active jobs, where the pricing page shows no US dollar figure.
- Pricing
- No US dollar price shown; Start caps active jobs at 5, Advance has unlimited jobs
Best for: Teams that want a no-card free trial and can work within the plan job caps
Pros
- The 'Try for free' option needs no credit card, so you can test the pipeline before a commitment.
- Optimize adds SSO, a testing environment and BI integrations, which matter when HR systems and reporting have to connect.
- Start includes 100 Screening Assistant credits and 3 Matching searches a month, a usable allowance for a first pipeline.
Cons
- No US dollar price is shown, so a US budget cannot be set from the page without a quote.
- The Start plan caps active jobs at 5, a limit that binds quickly for a team with several roles open.
Lever
A quote-only recruiting platform: the core platform and each add-on are priced after you request a quote.
- Pricing
- Quote only: the core platform and add-ons are priced after a quote request
Best for: Teams that accept a quote-led purchase and want optional add-ons scoped first
Pros
- The add-ons are named on the pricing page (Candidate Insights, AI Screening by VONQ and Onboarding), so you can scope them before the call.
- The purchase path is one clear form, 'Get My Price Quote', with no tiered pricing to decode.
- The core platform is sold as one product, which keeps the first contract simple to compare.
Cons
- No list price and no free trial are shown, so you cannot test the platform without a sales conversation.
- Like Greenhouse, the number arrives only after sales, which removes the cost comparison this page is built on.
What it is
An applicant tracking system holds your candidates, job postings, interview stages and feedback in one place. Greenhouse is one of the best known, built around structured interviews and scorecards that every interviewer fills in. The alternatives on this page do the same core job. They sell it in different shapes: a free plan that caps active roles, a per-user subscription, a flat annual fee, or a quote for a suite whose entry plan starts in the five figures.
Price structure matters more than the feature list when you replace Greenhouse, because the feature lists across the category look alike. The useful question is what the bill does when you add a user, open a tenth role or grow past the next headcount band.
Why it matters
Three pricing mechanics explain most of the switching. The first is the missing price. Greenhouse, Lever and Teamtailor all route buyers through a sales conversation, and Greenhouse's own pricing page says its pricing is customized based on each company's hiring needs. That is a legitimate model, but it means you cannot compare before you talk to a rep. The second is cost that rises with headcount. Per-employee and per-band pricing grows as the company grows, even when the recruiting team does not. The third is the bill beyond the plan: sourcing tools, onboarding and AI credits are often sold on top.
Breezy HR, JazzHR, Manatal, Workable and Ashby each publish at least one price, which removes the first mechanic. Breezy HR and JazzHR sell flat plans, which avoids the second. Manatal charges per user, so it keeps that mechanic. Workable and Ashby publish a starting price for one band and step up from there. Every switch trades one thing for another, and the trade is usually a cap. A free plan holds one open role, a flat plan limits monthly job postings, and a per-user plan grows with each recruiter. Our Greenhouse review covers the tool itself, and the ATS guide places it against the wider category.
Key features to look for
Pricing
Breezy HR, Manatal, JazzHR, Workable and Ashby each publish at least one dollar price on their own pricing pages: Breezy HR pricing, Manatal pricing, JazzHR pricing, Workable pricing and Ashby pricing.
SmartRecruiters shows a starting price without a billing term (SmartRecruiters pricing).
Recruitee and Lever show no US dollar price (Recruitee pricing, Lever pricing), and Greenhouse publishes none (Greenhouse pricing).
The Greenhouse figure in the table is an estimate, not a Greenhouse price. Vendr, a software purchasing marketplace, reports a median of $26,570 a year from 884 purchases. Buyers saved 16% on average, and the range runs from $10,207 to $74,330 (Vendr Greenhouse data, last updated February 2026). That median covers buyers of every company size, so it skews above a 50-person team.
Methodology: we read each vendor's pricing page on 10 October 2026, kept only figures shown in US dollars, and took the billing term printed beside each price. Per-user prices were multiplied out at the scenario above (50 employees, three users, billed yearly, one to three open roles).
Band prices stay as each page shows them, and the cards say where the 50-person band is not shown. Where a page shows a price with no billing term, the table says so.
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Breezy HR Bootstrap | Free | One active position or candidate pool at a time; unlimited users |
| Breezy HR Startup | $157 a month billed annually | Unlimited positions; the page also shows $189 a month without a label |
| Breezy HR Growth | $273 a month billed annually | Unlimited positions; priced between Startup and Business |
| Breezy HR Business | $439 a month billed annually | Top self-serve tier; Custom Pro is quoted separately |
| Manatal Professional | $15 per user a month billed annually | Up to 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates per account; 14-day trial |
| Manatal Enterprise | $35 per user a month billed annually | Unlimited jobs and candidates |
| JazzHR Hero | $1,000 a year billed annually | Starting at 3 job postings a month, subject to eligibility |
| JazzHR Plus | $3,480 a year billed annually | Up to 200 active jobs |
| JazzHR Pro | $5,508 a year billed annually | Everything in Plus, plus the Pro features |
| Workable Standard | $299 a month, or $3,588 a year billed annually | Unlimited active jobs; 15-day trial with no card |
| Workable Premier | $7,188 a year billed annually ($599 a month) | Steps up from Standard; price scales with employee count |
| Workable Enterprise | $8,628 a year billed annually ($719 a month) | Top tier; price scales with employee count |
| Ashby Foundations | $400 a month on the default band | Up to 100 employees; 10% off an annual commitment |
| SmartRecruiters Essential | Starting at $14,995, no billing term shown | Entry plan; the page shows no free plan or trial |
| Recruitee Start | No US dollar price shown | 5 active jobs and 100 Screening Assistant credits a month |
| Recruitee Advance | No US dollar price shown | Unlimited active jobs |
| Lever Core Platform | Quote only | Add-ons (Candidate Insights, AI Screening by VONQ, Onboarding) priced on request |
| Greenhouse (buyer estimate, Vendr) | About $26,570 a year (median) | Buyer-reported across all company sizes; Greenhouse publishes no list price |
Who it's for
Breezy HR if you hire for one role at a time and want a free plan that never expires, or if you run several roles and want unlimited users on one flat monthly price. Manatal if you are a small in-house team of two to five users with up to 15 open jobs on the account, and you want to pay per seat after a 14-day test.
JazzHR if you post a few roles a month and prefer one flat annual bill, after confirming posting eligibility. Workable or Ashby if you want a published price with employee bands and a broader platform, with Ashby suited to companies of up to 100 employees. SmartRecruiters, Lever or Greenhouse itself if you run hiring across several teams and have budget for a sales-led contract.
The bottom line
Manatal is the cheapest published paid option for a small team, and Breezy HR is the only free one among these eight tools. Choose Manatal if you have three or four users and can accept a bill that rises with each seat. Choose Breezy HR if you have one open role and want to pay nothing until you need a second.
JazzHR gives the lowest flat annual price at $1,000 a year, provided its job-posting limit fits how often you hire. Workable and Ashby are the published-price options once you want a broader platform, and SmartRecruiters, Lever and Greenhouse belong in the conversation only when you have budget for a sales-led contract.
Read the Greenhouse review for what you give up by switching, and the BambooHR review if your HR system matters as much as the ATS. Cite this: HRpresso, "Best Greenhouse Alternatives in 2026", October 2026.
Frequently asked questions
What is the cheapest Greenhouse alternative in 2026?
Is there a free Greenhouse alternative?
How much does Greenhouse cost?
Which Greenhouse alternatives publish their prices?
Is Workable cheaper than Greenhouse?
Is Ashby a good Greenhouse alternative for a 50-person company?
Sources
Prices and plan details come from each vendor's own pricing page, re-checked by the Toolradar pricing tracker.
- Workable pricingchecked Sep 2026
- Ashby pricingchecked Sep 2026
- SmartRecruiters pricingchecked Sep 2026
- Lever pricingchecked Sep 2026
Some offers on this page may be paid placements or contain affiliate links.
More HRpresso reviews
Buyer guides and software reviews, with prices read from each vendor's own pricing page.
Browse all reviews